Hagane
Operations manager reviewing a live dashboard in a Japanese manufacturing facility
Service 03 — ¥37,000 JPY — 8 Weeks

Your operations,
on one screen

A live operational view drawing production, inventory, and order figures into one place — with data freshness shown on every panel and metric definitions written so anyone can read them.

What This Delivers

Current figures. Shared definitions. No manual assembly.

Figures from your actual systems

The dashboard draws directly from your production, inventory, and order systems. No copy-paste into a spreadsheet each morning, no figures that are three hours old before anyone reads them.

Data freshness on every panel

Every figure on the view includes an indicator showing when it was last updated. You can see at a glance whether you're looking at a figure from two minutes ago or two hours ago.

Metric definitions agreed across departments

Every metric shown on the view has a written definition agreed with the departments whose data feeds it. Numbers mean the same thing to everyone who reads them.

The Situation

The figures exist. Getting them into one place takes half the morning.

Most operations teams work across several systems. Production runs in one platform, inventory in another, orders in a third. None of them were built to talk to each other, so the operational picture that managers need each morning has to be assembled by hand.

That assembly work falls to someone — often the operations manager, sometimes a coordinator. It takes time they'd rather use differently, and the result is still a snapshot from whenever the exports were pulled. By the time it reaches a decision, the figures are already behind.

There's also a softer problem: when departments maintain their own versions of the same number, small definitional differences accumulate until a meeting where no one's figures quite agree. The disagreement isn't about data — it's about what each team was counting.

Patterns We See Regularly

  • A coordinator spends 45–90 minutes each morning pulling exports from different systems and assembling a daily operations summary.

  • The summary circulates by email and is already hours old by the time it reaches the people who will act on it.

  • Two departments report different figures for the same metric because each is counting from a slightly different definition or a different point in the process.

  • When the coordinator is absent, the morning summary doesn't happen and the operations team works from memory or last week's figures.

Our Approach

A live view built around how your operations actually work

We don't begin by proposing a standard dashboard template. We begin by agreeing with you — and with the departments whose data will appear — what metrics matter and what each one means.

Metric Definition

Agreed across departments before anything is built

We work with production, inventory, and order management to agree on what each metric shown in the view will measure. Written definitions are signed off before we build the connections. This is where the work of aligning departments happens — not after the dashboard is live.

Source Connection

Connected to your existing systems

We connect the dashboard to your production, inventory, and order systems using whatever export or API capability they already provide. Where a system only exports files, we build the import step. No new platforms required.

Refresh Scheduling

Update frequency set to match what's useful

Different metrics update at different rates depending on what makes sense. A production line count might refresh every few minutes; an inventory figure might refresh hourly. The freshness indicator on each panel reflects the actual update schedule.

Access Permissions

Controlled by role and department

Access to the view is set by role. Not everyone needs to see everything, and access permissions are configured and documented as part of the build so they can be maintained by your IT staff after close.

What the Engagement Looks Like

Eight weeks, from metric agreement to live view

Weeks 1–2

Metric agreement

We meet with each relevant department to understand what they currently track and how. Metric definitions are drafted, reviewed, and agreed in writing by all parties before any build begins.

Weeks 3–5

Source connection

We connect the dashboard to each source system and establish the refresh schedule. A working view is available for internal review by the end of week five, showing real data with freshness indicators active.

Weeks 6–7

Feedback and adjustment

The operations team uses the view for two weeks alongside the existing morning process. We adjust metric definitions, panel layout, and refresh rates based on what the team finds useful or unclear.

Week 8

Handover and close

Staff training, access permission documentation, and the metric definition register are handed over. The morning assembly process is retired. Your team operates the view independently from this point.

Investment

What this engagement covers

One fixed price for the full eight weeks. Metric definition, source connection, feedback rounds, and all training and documentation are included.

Fixed Price

¥37,000

Full engagement fee — eight weeks

Start a Conversation

What's Included

  • Metric definition sessions with each relevant department

  • Written metric definition register, signed off before build

  • Source connection to production, inventory, and order systems

  • Data freshness indicator on every panel

  • Refresh scheduling per metric agreed with source teams

  • Access permissions by role, documented for IT maintenance

  • Two-week feedback period with adjustments included

  • Staff training for all who will use and maintain the view

Load Table — Indicative Figures

Metric Before After Implementation
Morning data assembly time 45–90 min per day (manual export and compilation) 0 min; view refreshes automatically on schedule
Figure age at time of review 2–4 hours (depends on when export was pulled) Shown per panel; typically minutes to one hour depending on source system
Metric definition alignment across departments Informal; varies between teams Written, agreed, and held in the metric definition register
Resilience when coordinator is absent Morning summary does not happen; team works from prior data View operates independently of any individual; accessible by all permissioned staff

Assumptions: Source systems can export data via file, database query, or API at the target refresh interval. Assembly time before implementation is estimated from the typical range for three-system manual compilation; actual time varies by operation size. Figure age after implementation depends on source system export capability — systems that only allow scheduled batch exports will show figures at batch frequency, not real-time.

How We Measure Progress

What gets tracked and how the engagement is assessed

01

Metric agreement completion

Whether all metrics shown in the view have written definitions signed off by the relevant department before the build phase begins. This is a gate, not a guideline.

02

Source connection stability

Whether each source system is feeding the dashboard reliably at the agreed refresh interval. Connection failures and their causes are logged during weeks three through seven.

03

Feedback round resolution

Issues raised by the operations team during the two-week feedback period in weeks six and seven. Number raised, number resolved before close, and any carried forward with explanation.

04

Handover readiness

Whether the staff who will maintain the view after close can demonstrate the ability to update access permissions, identify stale data, and locate the metric definition register without assistance.

Note on expectations: The dashboard displays what your source systems contain. If a source system has data quality issues — duplicate entries, uncategorised records, delayed updates from upstream processes — those will appear in the view. We document what we find during source connection but data quality remediation in source systems is outside this engagement's scope.

Our Commitment

Scope delivered or we talk about it

The scope of this engagement — metric definition, source connection, feedback rounds, access permissions, staff training, and documentation — is agreed before work begins. If any element is not delivered by close, that's a conversation we're prepared to have.

We don't guarantee figure accuracy beyond what your source systems contain, and we don't guarantee that the view will remove all manual work from your operations process. What we can stand behind is the quality of the build and the completeness of the handover.

If you'd like to understand whether your current systems can support the connections this engagement requires, we're available for a preliminary conversation at no charge.

Maintenance Panel — After Close

Metric definition updates

If a metric definition needs to change — new business logic, changed process, new department — the definition register is updated and the relevant teams are notified. The register format is designed for this.

Responsible: Operations manager; register format documented at handover

Access permissions

Adding or removing users and changing role assignments. The access configuration is documented and can be maintained by your IT staff.

Responsible: IT staff; configuration documented at handover

Source system changes

If a source system is replaced or its export format changes, the connection will require reconfiguration. We document the connection logic to make this as straightforward as possible.

Responsible: IT or operations staff; separate engagement available for major changes

Adding metrics or panels

New metrics follow the same definition process as the original build. Adding a new source system requires a separate scoping discussion.

Responsible: Operations manager initiates; separate engagement available

Getting Started

The path from here

Step 01

Describe your current situation

Tell us what systems your operations currently run on, how you assemble the morning picture today, and which departments the figures come from. A short description is enough at this stage.

Step 02

We confirm system compatibility

We'll let you know whether your source systems can support the connections this engagement requires, and if there are any questions we'd need to answer with your IT team before committing to scope.

Step 03

Scope agreed, work begins

Metrics, source systems, access structure, and timelines are set in writing. The eight-week engagement begins with the metric definition sessions outlined above.

Service 03 — Operations Dashboard Build

¥37,000 — Eight Weeks

If someone on your team spends each morning assembling figures that are already hours old by the time they reach a decision, a live view built around your existing systems may change how your operations team starts the day.

Send a Message

Other Services

Explore other areas where we work

Service 01

Predictive Maintenance Setup

Condition monitoring built from your equipment's existing sensor output. Fault signals routed to the right people before a scheduled inspection would catch them. Twelve weeks.

¥45,000

View Service

Service 02

Translation Workflow Integration

Assisted translation for recurring business documents with a maintained terminology base and a clear human review stage for customer-facing and contractual materials. Seven weeks.

¥33,000

View Service